One interesting question that has surfaced as regards Moyer's ongoing viability as a successful starting pitcher is only marginally related to his age--the question of his strikeout rate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a95c6/a95c6900fa0e91173f8a80ec79f5b200ea90043f" alt=""
So what we want to know is: how rare is to be a successful starting pitcher in the big leagues with such a low K-rate. Thanks to Forman et fil, we can create a list of starters from 1976-2011 who've had an ERA+ of 110 or higher with a K-rate below 3.5. That list can be found at the left, sorted backward in time from the present day to 1976.
What's immediately clear, of course, is that the drift toward more K's (a phenomenon with multiple causes) has pretty much pushed out low K-rate pitchers. There are only five pitcher seasons from 2000-2011 who fit such a low-K profile--and there are only 14 such seasons over that time where starters have thrown more than 150 innings with such a low K-rate.
From 1976-1979, of course--less than half a decade's worth of years--there are 23 pitcher seasons on our list, and a total of 53 pitcher seasons overall.
So while the changing nature of the game seems to be making these pitchers a species bordering on extinction, they are not all the way to dodo-bird status just yet. While long-term prospects for such pitchers remain guarded at best, there are still instances where low-K "mirror-meisters" can not only survive, but thrive.
And let's face it, what type of long-term prospects are there for Jamie Moyer to worry about? This is a low-key, off-beat, hard-to-fathom (add hyphenated phrase of choice here...) type of phenomenon--one that essentially defies analysis: let's have a good time while it lasts.