|...bloody Penumbra. (But Cristina Brondo|
might be worth getting sliced up for...)
So we will fly under the Hall of Fame--literally, in this case.
The vagrant thought that motivated this was an old chestnut: the platoon advantage. Or, rather, the disadvantage as it's often manifested in lefty hitters vs. lefty pitchers. We wondered if there might be any rhyme or reason in it--meaning some other kind of correlating pattern which explained its overall behavior.
So we decided to take a subgroup of hitters who would have been good enough to have actually given a prolonged opportunity to hit against lefties.
That group, after a couple of generous swallows of a high-powered Trappist ale, was identified as the left-handed hitting first basemen from 1930 to the present who are just below Hall of Fame level play.
Forman et fil calculate on their splits pages). That data is presented in the table at the left.
When we average out some of the other salient data about these guys, we discover that, as is the case generally in baseball as it's moved into the present, power is increasing. We took our three historical categories (30s-50s, 60s-80s, 90s-now) and averaged the ISO (isolated power) and the XBA (our stat, called eXtra Base Average, the percentage of total bases that are created from extra-base hits). When you look at that, you'll see that there's a big uptick in the last 20 years.
This is also accompanied by a general improvement in the performance level of the lefty-swinging first sackers who are "bubbling under" the HoF.
The XBA values, not shown in the chart, mirror the ISO: .556 for the 30s-50s group; .573 for the 60s-80s group; .640 for the 90s-to-the-present group.
The overall LOPS+ value for all 38 lefty-swinging first basemen is 79. That is, they lose about 21% of their overall OPS+ as a result of facing left-handed pitchers.
The historical data shows that there was a slight dip in the platoon performance of the lefty first-sackers who played in the 60s-80s group.
From this, it doesn't look like there's a whole lot to this study...
But it turns out there's another way to slice the data. (There's always another way to slice the data.)
And, in this case, the slice we want to do looks at a grouping of players by their ISO/XBA.
When we lump players into six XBA categories (.499-, .500-.549, .550-.599, .600-.649, .650-.699, and .700+), we see that there's almost a linear correlation. We've run the power data "backwards" in our chart; it runs from the most powerful to the least powerful, left to right, in order to show the virtually linear improvement in platoon advantage.
So what we're seeing here is that the more XBA or ISO these players have, the worse they are at hitting left-handed pitching.
But it's not something that we've ever seen broken out in any way. So, here it is.
We of course realize that this is a highly targeted small sample size. It surely isn't representative of average players--though it could be. One thing to test is the performance of other lefty-hitting players who play different positions, but who hit at an analogous level for their defensive position. (In other words, hitters from other defensive positions who are the "bubbling under the HoF" types.)
We'll probably get to that a bit later on in the remaining off-season.
|Ryan Howard: disappearing into a cloud of smoke|
But he had a very pronounced platoon split (just 61 LOPS+, one of the worst such scores among the players we've broken out).
The positive point, however: he owned righties.
That makes him eerily similar to a man who, unlike him, is widely considered to be a vastly overrated player--Ryan Howard.
Cash spent a portion of his later career being sat out against lefties. That was a lot easier to do in those days because the Tigers weren't paying him an absolute king's ransom to play. The Phillies might be well-advised to have Howard sit against lefties, but given what they're paying him, it just isn't feasible.